Is It Safe to Invest in Credit Risk Funds After Franklin Templeton?

Credit risk funds are not entirely unsafe after the Franklin Templeton crisis, but they remain a high-risk investment. New regulations have improved safety, but they are only suitable for experienced investors with a long-term horizon.

TrustyBull Editorial 5 min read

What is a Debt Mutual Fund and Are Credit Risk Funds Still a Good Idea?

Did you know that even after one of the biggest crises in Indian mutual fund history, credit risk funds still manage thousands of crores of investor money? It sounds strange, right? The Franklin Templeton episode in 2020 shook investor confidence. It made many people ask, is it ever safe to invest in these funds? Before we answer that, let's understand what is a debt mutual fund. Think of it as lending your money to multiple entities, like big corporations or even the government, through a fund manager. In return, you expect to earn interest.

Debt funds come in many flavours, each with a different level of risk. Some, like liquid funds, are very low-risk. Others, like credit risk funds, are on the riskier end of the spectrum. These funds specifically invest at least 65% of their money in corporate bonds that are rated AA or lower. Lower-rated bonds pay higher interest because the companies issuing them are considered less financially stable. The fund manager is betting that these companies will pay back their loans, delivering higher returns to you, the investor.

The Franklin Templeton Crisis: A Painful Lesson

Many people believe that all credit risk funds are a trap waiting to happen. This fear comes directly from the Franklin Templeton crisis in April 2020. What happened? When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, markets panicked. Investors rushed to pull their money out of mutual funds, including Franklin's popular debt schemes.

Here was the problem: these funds held many lower-rated bonds that are not easy to sell in a hurry. There were no buyers. The fund house couldn't sell the bonds fast enough to pay back the investors who wanted to exit. This created a severe liquidity crunch. To prevent a complete collapse, Franklin Templeton took the drastic step of shutting down six of its debt funds, locking in investor money for an unknown period. It was a massive shock and a lesson in two key investment risks: credit risk (the risk of the borrower not paying back) and liquidity risk (the risk of not being able to sell an asset quickly).

The Case For Avoiding Credit Risk Funds

The Franklin episode highlighted the real dangers of this category. If you are a cautious investor, the arguments against these funds are strong and clear.

  • Default Risk is Real: The core of a credit risk fund is lending to less-than-perfect companies. While a good fund manager does their research, the chance that one of these companies fails to pay its debt is always present. If a company defaults, the value of your fund (the NAV) will fall sharply.
  • Liquidity Can Vanish: In normal times, a fund can sell its bonds to meet redemption requests. But during a market panic, the buyers for lower-rated bonds simply disappear. As the Franklin case showed, this can lead to your money getting stuck for months or even years.
  • They Are Not Fixed Deposit Replacements: Many investors were sold these funds as a slightly better alternative to a bank Fixed Deposit (FD). This is completely wrong. FDs offer safety and guaranteed returns. Credit risk funds offer no guarantees and can lose you money.

The biggest risk in a credit risk fund isn't just losing some returns; it's the potential loss of your capital and the inability to access your own money when you need it most.

Why Do People Still Invest in Them? The Potential Upside

So, if they are so risky, why does this category even exist? Because with high risk comes the potential for high returns. This is the primary reason some investors are still willing to consider them.

The main attraction is the higher yield. Because the underlying bonds pay more interest, these funds can deliver better returns than safer debt funds like corporate bond funds or banking & PSU funds. For an investor with a truly high-risk appetite, a small, carefully chosen allocation to a credit risk fund can boost the overall portfolio's returns.

More importantly, the market regulator, SEBI, stepped in after the crisis to make things safer. This is the “solution” part of the story. SEBI introduced several new rules to prevent a repeat of the Franklin incident:

  1. Liquidity Buffers: Debt funds are now required to hold a certain percentage of their assets in cash or extremely liquid government bonds. This acts as a safety cushion to handle sudden redemption pressure.
  2. Stricter Valuation: Rules for how funds value lower-rated bonds have been tightened. This ensures the fund's NAV is a more accurate reflection of the real market value of its holdings.
  3. Improved Transparency: Fund houses must now provide more detailed information about the credit quality and liquidity profile of their portfolios, allowing investors to make more informed decisions. You can learn more about these regulatory changes on the SEBI website.

The Verdict: Are Credit Risk Funds Safe For You?

So, is it safe? The answer is nuanced. Credit risk funds are safer than they were before 2020 because of the new regulations. However, they are not, and will never be, 'safe' in the traditional sense. The inherent risk of lending to weaker companies remains.

The myth that all credit risk funds must be avoided is an oversimplification. The truth is, they are a specialist tool for a specific type of investor. You should only consider them if you meet all of these conditions:

  • You have a high tolerance for risk and are comfortable with the possibility of losing a portion of your capital.
  • You have a long investment horizon of at least 3 to 5 years. This gives the fund time to recover from any credit events or market downturns.
  • You have a well-diversified portfolio and are only allocating a small part (say, 5-10%) to this high-risk category.

If you are a beginner, have a low-risk appetite, or are looking for a place to park your emergency funds, you should stay far away from credit risk funds. Safer options like liquid funds or short-duration funds are much better choices for you.

How to Pick a Fund if You Decide to Invest

If you've ticked all the boxes and decided to proceed, don't just pick the fund with the highest past returns. Instead, do your homework:

  • Analyse the Portfolio: Look at the fund's holdings. How much is invested in AA, A, and BBB-rated bonds? A fund with heavy exposure to the lowest-rated papers is taking on more risk.
  • Check the Fund House: Choose a large, reputable fund house with a proven track record in risk management.
  • Don't Chase High Yields: An unusually high yield often means the fund manager is taking on extreme risk to generate it. Prioritise safety over a few extra percentage points of return.

Credit risk funds are not the monsters some make them out to be, but they are not gentle giants either. They are a powerful tool that, if used incorrectly, can cause significant harm to your financial health.

Frequently Asked Questions

What went wrong with Franklin Templeton's debt funds?
The funds faced massive redemption requests during the COVID-19 market panic. They held illiquid, lower-rated bonds that they couldn't sell quickly enough to return money to investors, forcing them to halt redemptions.
Are credit risk funds a good replacement for Fixed Deposits (FDs)?
No. Credit risk funds are much riskier than FDs. They carry the risk of capital loss due to defaults or interest rate changes, while FDs offer guaranteed returns and capital protection up to a certain limit.
How have regulations changed for debt funds after the crisis?
SEBI has introduced stricter rules. These include mandating that debt funds hold a certain percentage of their portfolio in highly liquid assets, improving valuation norms, and increasing transparency about portfolio risks.
Who should invest in credit risk funds?
Only investors with a high-risk appetite, a deep understanding of the product, and an investment horizon of at least 3-5 years should consider these funds for a small portion of their portfolio.